A Moral Pluralist Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility: From Good to Controversial Practices

TitreA Moral Pluralist Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility: From Good to Controversial Practices
Type de publicationArticle de revue
AuteurEabrasu, Marian
TypeArticle scientifique dans une revue à comité de lecture
Année2012
LangueAnglais
Date2012/11/01
Numéro4
Pagination429 - 439
Volume110
Titre de la revueJournal of Business Ethics
ISSN0167-4544 / 1573-0697
Mots-clésConsensus, Controversies, Corporate social responsibility, Economic Growth, ethics, Good practices, Management/Business for Professionals, Morality, Pluralism, Quality of Life Research
Résumé en anglais

This study starts from the observation that there are relatively few controversial issues in corporate social responsibility (CSR). Given its strong normative background, CSR is rather an atypical discipline, especially in comparison with moral philosophy or applied ethics. Exploring the mainstream CSR agenda, this situation was echoed by widespread consensus on what was considered to be “good practice”: reducing pollution, shutting down sweatshops, discouraging tax evasion, and so on. However, interpretation of these issues through the lens of moral pluralism unveils latent controversies. The moral appraisal of good practices within CSR depends on key moral concepts (such as harm, responsibility, intention, and consequences), which have various—and often incompatible—interpretations. In a nutshell, this article argues that from a moral pluralist standpoint, all CSR topics are potentially controversial.

URL de la noticehttp://okina.univ-angers.fr/publications/ua901
DOI10.1007/s10551-012-1491-3
Lien vers le document

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1491-3

Titre abrégéA Moral Pluralist Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility